In this video, I go over the process of flashing an ATI. Built on the 40 nm process, and based. The Radeon HD 5870 Mac Edition was a high-end graphics card by ATI, launched on June 30th, 2010. Question: Q: ATI Radeon HD 5870 Driver for Mac OS X I have a 2009 Mac Pro with a. Ati Radeon Drivers Download Utility.
![]() Ati Radeon Hd 5870 Windows 7 Native DirectX11Considering I don't run Windows 7 native DirectX11 definitely isn't of much interest to me. :) At the time I only bought it because the NVIDIA card that came with my Mac Pro by default was pretty pathetic (hell even the early 2009 24-inch iMac got better FPS). Turns out it's actually slightly better at the moment. A friend claimed to no end that the 5770 would "beat my 4870 any day". The 5770 is the new generations mid-range and thus it is designed to get the previous mid-range buyers to upgrade not to get the previous high-end buyers to upgrade (like yourself) instead they want you to get the HD 5850 or HD 5870 (but Apple only sells the HD 5870 for you high-end folks :))Cool, thanks for chart Vice! I never really got into the whole GPU thing and mostly rely on advice of others when it comes to this. 661-5719 Apple Video Card ATI Radeon HD 5870 1 GB for Mac Pro 2.Guru3D (respected PC hardware review website) did benchmarks and these were the resultsHD 4870: FPS = 54 (Yes the older 4870 beat the 5770)HD 4870: FPS = 73 (Yes the older 4870 beat the 5770 again)You are probably thinking why does this older card match and sometimes beat the newer one? And the answer is that the HD 4870 was ATI's last generation high end single GPU card.The 5770 is squarely mid-range and the HD 5870 is a high-end card. It is considered a low-end to just touching mid-range card. I have no facts to back that statement up it's just something Apple tends to do quite often.If your wondering cost wise the HD 5750 is about £95 retail. Quicken for mac convert from windowsI have no idea how you're supposed to get any serious performance out of an under clocked low-end GPU in combination with a high-res 27-inch screen.If Apple/ATI would just keep fixing up their damn OpenGL implementation/drivers :p, my Radeon HD 4850 in this iMac would be more than enough for me. When it comes to graphics the iMacs still stuck beyond no believe though. Before that even the low-end Mac Pro was in a whole different league than the Core 2 Duo iMacs. They've definitely done this to the late 2009, early 2008 and mid 2007 versions.It became one after the Quad-Core 27-inch iMac was released. It already gets pretty hot when playing games and the iMac has as few fans as possible (as it uses more passive heat dissipation). Otherwise, it would probably fry a hole in the back of this aluminum enclosure. I'm sure they have to underclock the 4850 a slight bit. With recommended detail levels in Portal, I get about 40-50FPS at 2560x1440, and World of Warcraft runs like butter at 2560x1440 with most everything turned way up and some AA to boot (then again, WoW isn't exactly graphics intensive and should really run better than it does the Windows version performs much better).I think you are right, though.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorNick ArchivesCategories |